Your best source of information and news about iphone nano, iphone nano and free iphone on the internet
iPhone REVIEW TOP 50 iPhone VIDEOS iPhone CARD iPhone SOFT

Is iPhone 2.0 a Better Match for Google’s Android?


Google Android phone

When Google last year unveiled Android, its open-source mobile phone platform, I published an article titled, Android vs. iPhone: Will the Google Phone Be an iPhone Killer?

At the time, before iPhone 2.0, it looked like Android had a good shot at taking down the iPhone, for several reasons:

Add to that the fact that when I wrote the article, there was still no mention of 3G data speeds or GPS being on the iPhone.

iPhone 2.0: A lot’s changed in half a year

Apple is not oblivious to Android’s potential, so it looks like they’ve stepped up their game to take on Google with iPhone 2.0.

The 2nd-generation iPhone will cost $200-$300 — discounted by an AT&T iPhone subsidy that will lose the wireless company money.

The App Store on iPhone 2.0 will let third-party developers distribute their own apps. Plus the new iPhone will have 3G and GPS features.

Still some obstacles remain:

1. iPhone is bound to AT&T for another four years

What was Apple thinking signing a five-year contract in such a fast-moving industry? While Google dominates the subscriber bases of T-Mobile, Verizon and Sprint, iPhone will be stuck in a cage with AT&T.

2. iPhone is not open source

Open-source means greater flexibility. A 100% open-source handset powered by Android will have large communities behind it, working to improve every aspect of the phone.

iPhone, on the other hand, will have only Apple behind it. Of course, there will be the upcoming App Store, which gives developers some freedom to distribute their applications. But such a setup is far from open source. That’s why I think that to compete with Google, Apple will have to work to make the future of iPhone as open as possible.

3. iPhone has only one look

It may come a time when the iPhone will become so trendy that people won’t want to buy one and fit into the crowd. Would you feel funny if you were sitting at a dinner table, and all six people in your party had iPhones?

The handset hardware that will carry the Android platform will be built by several companies in Google’s Open Handset Alliance. So people will be able to have their own unique phones, but all powered by Android software.

On the other hand, it might work out in Apple’s favor for the iPhone to maintain a consistent design. That could give it a more memorable brand identity than Google’s Android, which will not have one iconic look like that of the iPhone.

Android vs. iPhone: Which is the better phone?

Hai of Mobile Madness points out a few things Android developers can do to dominate the iPhone:

  • Make software distribution decentralized, but organized so that application distribution can become viral.
  • Improve and encourage consistency of design among Android applications.
  • Target third-world countries.

— Hai on What Android needs to do to compete with iPhone

All of these are good strategies that either company could follow, and they show the expanse of opportunities that have arisen in this now-revolutionized mobile phone industry.

I think at this point, considering Google’s history of successful products, it’s anyone’s game.

But iPhone 2.0 is without-a-doubt much better equipped to handle Android than the old iPhone was.

iPhone or Android? What do you think?

Which is the better phone? I would love to hear your opinion in the comments.


Written by Chris. Read more great feeds at is source WEBSITE
with no comments.
Read more articles on google and iPhone Competitors.

Related articles

No comments

There are still no comments on this article.

Leave your comment...

If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:




You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .